Stuck? 
support@mecway.com
support@mecway.com
Mecway
FEA
disla
About
- Username
- disla
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,947
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
All geometries have initial penetration. Some contact definitions are solved as an interference fit. take a look at the adjust parameter.
-
I'm in particular referencing to this convention. Are shears (gammas) , ccx output strains x 2 ? EDITED: SOLVED. I have seen in the FRD the value in the GUI is Twice the value in the FRD. Thanks. Is that for consistency with Openradioss?
-
@Sebastianmaklary Hi, I did not respond you just because I saw the Kuhl example file. Let me know if you need any further help. Regards.
-
Looks fine to me although the stiffness value of the base look unnecessary high. I guess you are looking for a hard contact behavior?. Note there is only compression in the part of the base that is pushed up and compressed against the base. Node…
-
Not the same. Let's see if I can explain with my poor English. ChatGPT doesn't understand me. An only compression support creates a set of elements in which the surface is supported. "Like" regular springs but nonlinear in this case. They only wor…
-
It works great transfering only compresion in between the parts in the hole area. This machine has three of this set ups and it converge nicely. Principal Stress 1 (Tensle) and 3 (Red_Compressive).The piece is free to move .
-
Hi Forced convection maybe?. There are some examples in the forum and explained in the manual. Regards
-
Welcome to the forum Rudolf
-
Yep, it would be a bit confusing. Considering that w is the transverse direction, (also the normal vector for shells), maybe it would be more convenient to change the GUI input to Angle about W instead of U. Kind of a "rotation of actual definition…
-
I think that for prismatic/cylindrical shapes it can be easier to set a general orientation like the one in my previous post and then play with the degrees option to adjust the +-45 or whatever for each layer.
-
According to your picture, if geometry is centered at zero , you can get a radial distribution of orientations with:
-
Not sure if you know Element orientation can be coordinate dependent.
-
It seems to fail much way sooner. Elements sizes below approx. 3mm (0.003)when the inp is expressed in meters. I will post in ccx forum before github to confirm.
-
Hi Victor, Once scaled (with all node dimensions bigger than 1) I have modeled MORTAR with pefect HARD. The agreement is so perfect that everithing black bloack Clearance zero. Mortar (ccx) has some issues when it deals with small numbers. Seems …
-
Don't know why but the problem solves if it is scaled by 1000.¿?¿
-
Files: contact4_mortar.inp Result when run in the monitor. Files: MECWAY_Contact4_mortar.liml Green window but no resuts.
-
Regarding RF on the REF node , there is a bug in 2.22 that has been fixed in the last ccx version 2.23. https://calculix.discourse.group/t/ref-node-of-pretension-section-reaction-force/3759
-
HI, Have you noticed that Contact State doesn't give a solution when the quasiestatic option is active. There is a message of unknown reason.
-
Thanks Victor. I will pay more attention to the ramp. Regarding the Pretension Ref Node I will also ask in the Calculix forum to see if someone has a clue of why RF value doesn't match.
-
It should be RF= Pretension section Load resultant. This is not right sorry. As RF contains the sum of external forces RF should be Zero. In any case the value is unnexpected.
-
Thanks for the comments . There are still some things I don't fully understand. Apart from the mesh and length adjustment possible incompatibility. 1-I'have been thinking for a long time that when analysis is performed with Automatic time steppin…
-
File for reference. All three set ups for pretension section loads are ready. Just activate and deactivate the one you need.
-
Thanks Victor.
-
Hi, I have always found the ccx output is kind of weird. Taking into consideration that looking at the reactions is part of any study's basic check , could you consider postprocessing that value internally subtracting the imposed forces to have onl…
-
It now converges with *TIE contact on the LUGS too. ?¿?.
-
Hi @Victor, I had no issues with the actual way MECWAY does it. For this problem, Mecway Only Compression converges fine but doesn't capture properly the behavior of the system . Is not a MECWAY problem. When I say is more stable and causes fewer…
-
It has turned out that tying the base nodes together as a rigid body is more stable and causes fewer convergence problems than applying *boundary. On the other hand, releasing one of the degrees of freedom is simpler. *RIGID BODY,NSET=COMPRESSIONON…
-
Once again my explorer doesn't update the mecway webpage. Most of these are duplicated Now it's more clear to me. 1-¿Do you mean all bases tighten to a REF and ROT Node (with Rigid Body not Kinematic). I will try.
-
I have look in detail one of the compressions only supports, the Gapuni elements generated for it with their nodes. It is more complex than I thought. You are creating two GAPUNI per node, but some nodes are missing the second one. They are the o…
-
Hi @Victor, One additional question. There is a total of 96 *ELEMENT,TYPE=GAPUNI. I can see it in the INP. There are two identical Compression Only Supports 48 GAPUNI each side. GAPUNI (2-node unidirectional gap element). One is the base and the…
